Extraversion
More drawn to outward engagement with people and activities. This does not mean a person never needs time alone.
Opposite preference: Introversion (I)Jung personality types
An outward, analytical approach to new possibilities.
ENTP stands for Extraversion, Intuition, Thinking and Perceiving. In this framework, it describes a preference for outward engagement, possibilities, logical evaluation and keeping options open.
SimilarMinds offers a 16-type test based on Jung’s ideas and the Myers–Briggs implementation—an independent MBTI analog.
48 questions · Free results · Optional saving to your profile
Preferences describe an approach—not an ability or a rule.
More drawn to outward engagement with people and activities. This does not mean a person never needs time alone.
Opposite preference: Introversion (I)More drawn to patterns and possibilities than concrete detail and direct experience.
Opposite preference: Sensing (S)More inclined to weigh logical consistency when deciding. Feeling emphasizes values and effects on people.
Opposite preference: Feeling (F)More inclined to leave room for new information than settle early on an organized plan.
Opposite preference: Judging (J)From the SimilarMinds response archive
Six selected item comparisons: people classified as ENTP versus the other 15 Jung types combined.
These are historical questionnaire averages on a stored 0–4 answer scale. They are not percentages or population rankings.
“I thrive on the rush of risk taking.”
Difference: +0.97 scale points
ENTP: 165 responses · Other types: 2,840 responses
“I am good at making impromptu speeches.”
Difference: +0.90 scale points
ENTP: 120 responses · Other types: 2,884 responses
“I suspect that people like to talk to me because my ideas are unusual.”
Difference: +0.66 scale points
ENTP: 133 responses · Other types: 2,871 responses
“I am good at analyzing problems.”
Difference: +0.51 scale points
ENTP: 121 responses · Other types: 2,886 responses
“I challenge others' points of view.”
Difference: +0.55 scale points
ENTP: 131 responses · Other types: 2,874 responses
“I am one of the most curious and inquiring persons I know.”
Difference: +0.55 scale points
ENTP: 134 responses · Other types: 2,874 responses
Source: the legacy SimilarMinds poll/mbti archive, active scaled-question results, retrieved November 9, 2026. Groups use the full four-letter classification; ENTP is compared with all other valid four-letter types, excluding ENTP. Genders and questionnaire versions are pooled.
Each mean is the response-count-weighted sum of stored answer values divided by that item’s response count. Counts vary by item and are not a count of unique people across the archive. The displayed difference is the ENTP mean minus the pooled comparison mean.
Examples were selected for readable coverage of different tendencies from items with positive standardized group differences. These are not the six largest differences, a neutral-mood screen, or an independent validation: some questions may have contributed to the type assignment. Self-selection, repeated submissions and questionnaire changes limit generalization.
Minimum counts: 100 responses for this type and 500 across other types. The exact values used in the charts appear below.
| Archive item | ENTP mean (n) | Other types mean (n) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| #168: I thrive on the rush of risk taking. | 2.75 (165) | 1.77 (2,840) | +0.97 |
| #370: I am good at making impromptu speeches. | 2.63 (120) | 1.73 (2,884) | +0.90 |
| #1938: I suspect that people like to talk to me because my ideas are unusual. | 2.65 (133) | 1.99 (2,871) | +0.66 |
| #368: I am good at analyzing problems. | 3.48 (121) | 2.97 (2,886) | +0.51 |
| #724: I challenge others' points of view. | 3.22 (131) | 2.67 (2,874) | +0.55 |
| #454: I am one of the most curious and inquiring persons I know. | 3.12 (134) | 2.57 (2,874) | +0.55 |
For the meaning of the letters, read the Jung preference and scoring guide. The Big Five and Jung comparison looks at overlap between the two systems.
SimilarMinds questionnaire findings
Personality items associated with higher ENTP scores.
In the original SimilarMinds analysis, people who scored higher on ENTP also scored higher than the average on the personality items below.
These are group-level associations, not a checklist every ENTP must match. Some items concern mood, self-image or social experiences; the full list preserves the original findings rather than defining requirements of the type.
Use these possibilities to reflect on your own experience.
A discussion may help you discover what you think. Letting people know when you are testing an idea can stop a tentative argument from sounding like your final position.
Consider: Are you exploring a possibility or asking for a decision?
You may quickly notice an alternative explanation or a different way to frame a problem. Comparing the alternatives against the actual goal can help identify which is useful.
Consider: Which alternative changes what you would do?
An experiment can be more appealing than a detailed commitment. Agreeing on a stopping point helps turn that experiment into a result other people can use.
Consider: When will you review the experiment and choose a next step?
Each of these codes differs by one preference.
Keeping options open to revision versus moving toward a settled plan.
Explore ENTJT ↔ FGiving more weight to impersonal reasoning versus personal values when making a decision.
Explore ENFPE ↔ IEngaging outwardly versus reflecting inwardly as the more natural starting point.
Explore INTPA narrow score difference deserves less emphasis than a clear preference. Read the paired scores alongside the letters.
Work & learning
Rather than choosing a career from a type label, ask whether a role offers the kind of work you enjoy:
Your interests, experience and actual skills are more specific than four letters.
Relationships & communication
Challenging an idea can be enjoyable for you while feeling personal to someone else. Checking whether the other person wants debate, support or a practical decision can make the exchange more useful for both of you.
For a more detailed comparison, use actual trait scores. The Distinct Traits feature lets two people compare their results side by side.
Explore personality compatibility →From the original ENTP page
The original favored and disfavored lists are preserved below. They are reported associations, not recommendations or measures of job suitability.
dictator, computer consultant, international spy, tv producer, philosopher
personal assistant, wedding planner, travel agent, secretary, interior decorator
No. SimilarMinds is an independent Jung-style 16-type test, not the official MBTI assessment. It uses the familiar four-letter preference framework. Read about the SimilarMinds Jung system.
Read the scores rather than treating the letters as equally strong. A Thinking score of 51% and Feeling score of 49% is a much narrower difference than 80% versus 20%. A small change in answers could change the letter in a close pair.
A four-letter result by itself does not establish a measured function ordering. SimilarMinds has a separate Cognitive Functions test that asks about introverted and extraverted forms of the functions.
The letters do not measure whether a particular relationship will work. Comparing actual trait scores gives more detail about where two people resemble one another and where they differ; communication, values and circumstances also matter.
You can save your Jung result to your SimilarMinds profile alongside other tests. Public sharing is optional. For pairwise similarity and compatibility tools, take and save the Distinct Traits test.
Take the test, then explore each preference in your own results.
Framework background: The Myers & Briggs Foundation’s preference guide. SimilarMinds implementation: Jung personality system. The everyday examples on this page are interpretations of the framework, not new research findings.